Skewed coverage is an injustice to SA’s victims of intolerance

In the Cape’s Weekend Argus, columnist William Saunderson-Meyer pertinently points out the contrast between the overwhelming – and appropriately outraged – media response to the UFS racist video debacle with the story of student in Limpopo who was killed for refusing to sing a “struggle” song on the way back from a protest at the Union Buildings – a murder that went virtually unreported both locally and abroad.

To their credit, the Sowetan broke the story on 27 February:

Immediate suspension awaits three students accused of beating another student to death.

The University of Limpopo’s Turfloop campus said yesterday that George Tsoai, 24, Raymond Mabelebele, 23 and Tibane Serumula, 22, would be suspended from the institution – if and when they were released from jail.

The students were denied bail yesterday by the Mankweng magistrate’s court in connection with the killing.

The three allegedly beat Nkosinathi Mhlongo during a minibus trip from Pretoria on Friday.

Mhlongo apparently refused to sing a protest song on a minibus ferrying the students to Turfloop.

According to the university the accused, affiliated to Sasco, asked for a lift to Polokwane in a mini- bus that ferried only members of the Students Christian Organisation (SCO).

“An argument ensued when they forcefully tried to stop the SCO members from singing Christian songs. Mhlongo allegedly refused to sing their protest songs and was allegedly beaten all the way from Mokgophong to Mankweng Hospital.”

Police spokesman Malan Nchabeleng said his body was thrown out of the rear window of the minibus near the hospital.

On the 3 March, the imminent appearance of the alleged murderers in court was then reported in a minuscule article on In the report neither the victim’s nor the perpetrators political affiliations were mentioned. The motivation – political intolerance – wasn’t either.

On the 10 March, the suspension of the alleged murderers (incidentally described as “student leaders”) from the university was reported only by but this report seems to be at variance with the version of events described by the Sowetan and a regional paper called the Northern Review which both mention the insistence of the SASCO youths that the Christian students in the taxi sing “struggle” songs and not Christian ones. Christian organisations have subsequently called for SASCO to be suspended at the University of Limpopo.

Ultimately, though, media coverage of this tragedy has been pitiful. That the story has not received widespread coverage almost implies that such a crime is perceived by media gatekeepers as insignificant – simply not worth column inches or airtime. Where is the anger, the outrage, the debate that was catalysed by the UFS video? There is just deafening, hypocritical silence.

It is incumbent upon all South Africans to speak out against this senseless, sick violence. But we can only speak out against it if we are aware of it. And the responsibility for that, in many ways, lies with the media in reporting it.



Filed under Uncategorized

6 responses to “Skewed coverage is an injustice to SA’s victims of intolerance

  1. Great (if disturbing) observation. This kind of media bias is prevalent in many situations.

    The Pew Research Centre once did a study and found that the vast majority of journalists are considerably to the left of their average reader. Combine this with a tendency to editorialise and selectively report the news, and you get preconceived narratives about the world.

    One classic example is the notion that white oppression or racism is a perennial scourge, but black racism is either ignored or condoned. Such preconceived narratives are also often evident in reporting on environmental issues, corporate activity, and political matters. For example, that Serbs are the bad guys in the former Yugoslavia, is a presumption in much reporting on the region, when in at best that is a gross (and unfair) over-generalisation from history. Same goes for Israel and Palestine.

    Such simplistic narratives are really a sign of lazy reporting and lazy analysis. They’re a sign of lazy — and prejudiced — minds.

  2. Pingback: Global Voices Online » South Africa: Skewed media coverage

  3. SASCO

    The call by the SCO (the church) is out of order, because there is no any way that SASCO could be suspended, because of individual’s problems. We as SASCO we were not even aware of that trip.The other thing that we should like to enlighten this gangster is that the sqabble that they are attempting to raise is imaterial, we can even argue to say that even the Univesity should be close because such culprits were the students. Embark on what will make your organisation to prosper, PHAMBHILI SASCO PHAMBHILL!!

  4. Pingback: Thought Leader » Alex Matthews » Umshinis could kill our democracy

  5. Only came across this story now. Amazing how low its profile has been.

    On my blog I have also been trying to make sense of the skewed SA media coverage.

  6. Sorry, I meant to write that post in my other identity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s