The heron and the frog – is it really too late for a compromise?

AT THE BACK of my Afrikaans classroom at school was a cartoon depicting a frog with his head shoved down a heron’s throat, both arms strangling the bird’s neck.

The metaphor can easily be applied to the relationship between Thabo Mbeki and his ANC deputy, Jacob Zuma. They have reached a stalemate in a bitter competition to become head of the ruling party – and ultimately this country.

Both have it in their power to destroy each other’s political futures, and only one can survive.

Should Jacob Zuma win the ANC presidency at the Polokwane conference, he will use everything in his power to destroy his opponent’s powerbase, deploying loyal cadres to key positions within the party and, in 2009, the government. It is likely that with the power at his disposal, a Prez Zuma will ensure that Mbeki goes to trial as the latter would appear to be mired in as much (if not more) Arms Deal dirt as his deputy is.

The skeletons are rattling loudly in the war chest, and Mbeki is trying to make damn sure they stay in there. With Zuma in charge, all sorts of skandaal could come out, leaving the man with his dignity (something which he strangely sets great store by) in tatters.

Mbeki is therefore doing his utmost to retain control of his party and legacy. Should he win, he will continue his relentless abuse of state power to consolidate his power base, thus ensuring that Zuma is charged , sentenced, imprisoned – and ultimately nullified politically.

Even with the conference looming, it is impossible to forecast what the result will be. In the run up, one thing is certain, however: both are searching desperately for a Plan B. For both contenders, the risks of losing are too great and the consequences of that loss, catastrophic. I think they’ve realised that it is in both their best interests – and in the interest of the ANC and of South Africa as a whole – that a third way is found.

It will provide Mbeki with what he surely craves – a dignified, safe exit with a “legacy” intact. And it will take the heat of Zuma (the political pressure will surely wane when he is no longer an immediate threat to the political survival of half a party… the Mbeki half, that is), so that he can fight for the position at another more tenable time (and without a prison sentence hanging over his head).

I still believe it is possible – perhaps even likely – that someone else, with the blessing of both frontrunners (after some sleepless nights of negotiation) will step forward to paper over the yawning division in the ANC, and postpone the party’s inevitable split for another time. Cyril, for example.

Only time will tell.


Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “The heron and the frog – is it really too late for a compromise?

  1. Steve Hayes

    Yes, the heron and the frog image sums it up pretty well, and, as you say, time will tell.

    But the very fact that the ANC, as South Africa’s largest political party, has been transformed from a liberation movement to an arena for squabbling over the spoils of office bodes ill for the future of the country. Some will be cautiously neutral, but there is a nagging doubt — is it because they think there are better things for the people, or better things for themselves?

  2. Timothy Beattie

    Definitely, better things for themselves!
    Welcome to the gravy train of the New South Africa!
    (Ubuntu is just a farce).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s